Education’s Role in Earnings, Employment, and Economic Mobility
By Yesenia Ayala
Recently, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York released a report that explored the ways in which school type, selectivity, and major affect employment and earnings post-college both at six and at ten years after enrollment for fall freshman entry cohorts from 1997 to 2007.
Among the findings:
- For four-year institutions, findings demonstrate that college type and selectivity does make a difference in the labor market for medium term earnings (six years after enrollment).
- Those enrolled in selective colleges earned on average 11% more than similar students who attended non-selective institutions.
- Students who attended for-profit colleges earned on average 17% less than those who attended private not-for-profit four-year institutions.
- College major also played a role in medium term earnings. Students who earned a STEM major or a business major earned 10% more on average than those majoring in Arts and Humanities.
- For long-term earnings (ten years after enrollment), the data showed that college-type effects become more pronounced, while major choice effects remained similar to medium-term earning effects.
- Students who enrolled in selective colleges on average earned 20% more than students who attended non-selective colleges.
- Students who attended for-profit colleges earned on average 18% less than those enrolled in private, not-for-profit four-year institutions.
- The report also considered the impact that college-type had on economic mobility- which they defined as how earnings compared between the top and bottom income terciles.
- For-profit college attendance widened the income disparities between the top and bottom income terciles, increasing the earnings gap by 117% compared to private, not-for-profit colleges.
- Four-year public colleges lessened the income disparities between the top and bottom income terciles, decreasing the earnings gap by 25% compared to private, not-for-profit colleges.
- Selective colleges lessened the income disparities between the top and bottom income terciles, decreasing the earnings gap by 43% compared to non-selective institutions.